728*90


Elon Musk wants to revolutionize transportation. Again.
The serial entrepreneur envisions a future where mag-lev trains in enormous pneumatic tubes whisk us from Los Angeles to New York in 45 minutes. Need to be in Beijing tomorrow? No problem. It's a two-hour ride away.
As crazy as it sounds, Musk is merely updating an idea that's been around since the early 1900s, and at least one company is working on a functional prototype. But according to Wired sources, his involvement won't be nearly as hands-on as Musk's other endeavors at Tesla Motors and SpaceX.
The engineering behind the Hyperloop is similar to the old-school pneumatic tube systems used by banks to suck your deposit to the teller at the drive-through. But naturally, it's more complicated than that.
A massive vacuum tube — mounted either above ground or even under water — would be combined with a magnetic levitation system used on conventional bullet trains. That means no friction, no wind resistance, no chance of collisions, and insanely high speeds.
Musk described the Hyperloop as "a cross between a Concorde, a railgun and an air hockey table," at AllThingsD's D11 conference earlier this year. And in an interview with PandoDaily, Musk said the Hyperloop could form a fifth tent pole of modern transportation, joining cars, planes, trains, and boats, adding that because of its low energy usage and ability to get juice from solar power, it could generate more power than it would consume.
But up until now, he hasn't elaborated on his involvement.
Musk's interest in the idea was sparked after researching California's new high-speed rail project and realizing that it will be the slowest and — at $70 billion — the most expensive system on the planet. To his mind, there's a better solution. The Hyperloop is it. And one firm unaffiliated with Musk is in the early stages of development.
ET3, a company based in Longmont, Colorado, is working on a Evacuated Tube Transport (ETT) system, which it describes as "space travel on Earth." It uses two tubes — one for each direction — with 400-pound, passenger car-sized capsules that could house six people, each accelerated by linear electric motors. According to ET3, state trips would average speeds of around 370 mph, while international trips would hit that insane 4,000 mph mark.
The company, which calls itself an "open consortium," claims that it's working with partners in China and has sold nearly 100 licenses for the technology. But ET3′s claims pose more questions than answers, particularly when considering you can buy your own license for the bargain basement price of $100.
But the idea for a vacuum-sealed high-speed transit system isn't anything new. The "vactrain" concept was floated in the early 1910s and a paper written by physicist R.M. Salter and published by the Rand Corporation in 1972 titled the "Very High Speed Transit System," or VHST, describes something very similar to what ET3 is developing.
But where Musk fits in remains a question. Sources close to the Tesla co-founder and CEO say he believes ET3 is on the right track, but is missing some key components, and that Musk has his hands full with Tesla and SpaceX, and would rather have some involvement in the development, with another entity taking the helm.
That lines up with a few responses Musk made on Twitter when asked about patenting the technology. "I really hate patents unless critical to company survival," Musk tweeted. "Will publish Hyperloop as open source."
When asked about partners, Musk said he's "happy to work with the right partners. Must truly share philosophical goal of breakthrough tech done fast & w/o wasting money on BS."
We'll have to wait until August 12th to find out more.

Intel profit tumbles 29% on PC sales slump

Smartphones and tablets aren't killing Intel just yet, but the chipmaking giant is getting very badly bruised.

Amid an ongoing PC sales swoon, Intel on Wednesday reported its fourth straight quarter of sales declines and its third quarter in a row in which profit fell year-over-year. The company also gave a somewhat more pessimistic outlook for the rest of the year than it had previously forecast.
Shares of Intel (INTC, Fortune 500) pulled back 3% in after-hours trading.
Intel's business has struggled lately as PC sales remain very weak. Worldwide, shipments of PCs fell by 11% last quarter, according to Gartner. Tech consultancy iSuppli found that laptops turned in their worst year-over-year sales performance in 11 years.
Accordingly, sales of Intel's PC chips fell by 7.5%. They make up nearly two-thirds of the company's revenue.
Related story: Intel could make $200 touchscreen PCs a reality
To counteract the trend, Intel has desperately been trying to get into the mobile computing business. It made some limited headway recently, partnering with a handful of brands to put its chips in smartphones and tablets.
"There will always be another next big thing," Intel CEO Brian Krzanich said on a conference call with analysts. "It's our job to scan and search for emerging trends, and doing that will require some changes at Intel."
Krzanich restructured Intel's management two weeks ago with an eye toward fostering better communication and the flexibility needed to transition the company to the new ultra-mobile environment.
The new CEO, who began his job in May, said that Intel's strategy going forward can be summed up like this: "We will leave no computing opportunity untapped."
As part of that strategy, Intel will focus more heavily on its Atom lineup of mobile processors, though the company said PCs will continue to be core to the company's business.
Intel recently released its Haswell chip for PC tablets, ultrabooks and convertible laptops, but those models haven't sold well so far. The appeal of the new chip architecture is that it offers better battery life and faster processing speeds, making those devices more attractive. But Haswell chips are also expensive, making it difficult for manufacturers to lure in new customers with lower prices.
There's hope that PCs will begin making a comeback in the coming months. PCs generally perform well in the third quarter, hoisted up by back-to-school sales. Microsoft (MSFT,Fortune 500) is set to release improvements to its Windows 8 operating system aimed at addressing some negative feedback and confusion from customers.
PC makers have also begun lowering prices in an attempt to boost sales. Intel said its new Bay Trail lineup of PC chips will help to lower the price of touchscreen PCs.
By the numbers: The world's largest chipmaker said its net income fell to $2 billion, or 39 cents per share, in the second quarter. That's down 29% from a year earlier but in line with the median estimate of analysts polled by Thomson Reuters.
Sales for the Santa Clara, Calif., company fell 5% to $12.8 billion, just missing analysts' forecasts of $12.9 billion.
Intel said its current-quarter sales would come in between $13 billion and $14 billion, which is a bit lower than what most Wall Street analysts had been predicting. For the full year, Intel thinks its revenue will remain flat, down from an earlier forecast of a low single-digit percentage increase. 

Apple, Microsoft to leap on app auto-update bandwagon

By this fall, Apple and Microsoft will have followed in the footsteps of Google to automatically update apps on their mobile and desktop platforms, another step in the trend to take security out of users' hands.
"This is one of the best things we've seen in security in the last decade," argued Andrew Storms, senior director of development and operations at San Francisco-based CloudPassage. "Historically, we've always relied on the end user to update, and praying that they do so. Auto-updating means that the moment [a new version] is released, the majority has the most secure code available installed."
Google's Android and Chrome OS -- the latter based on the Chrome browser -- automatically update installed apps, silently and in the background, without bothering the user.
Both Apple and Microsoft will mimic Google later this year, when the former ships OS X Mavericks for the Mac and iOS 7 for the iPhone and iPad. Microsoft, too, has committed to app auto-updates, a feature that will debut in Windows 8.1 this fall.
On Windows and OS X, the new approach to app updating applies to just parts of their software ecosystems.
Only Windows Store apps -- those the company calls "Modern" but which many still dub "Metro" -- will auto-update. Older, traditional Windows apps, those that run on the old-school desktop -- will not.
OS X Mavericks is in the same boat: Only apps downloaded and installed through the Mac App Store will update hands-off. Software acquired through other channels -- downloads direct from the developer, for example -- will remain the user's responsibility.
Although legacy applications on Windows and OS X are out of the auto-update loop for now, many applications offer their own auto-updates. And third-party patch managers for enterprises and consumers -- an example of the latter for Windows is Secunia's Personal Software Inspector (PSI) -- are available to fill the gaps.
"The question becomes, how much more can be automated?" said Morten Stengaard, the CTO of Secunia. "Frankly, the more automation the better, because we cannot keep up with all the patches available."
This fall's roll-out of app auto-updating on Windows, OS X and iOS 7 is only the latest in a continuum of similar moves over the years to remove the weak link -- the user -- from the equation, Storms noted.
"What we're seeing is the operating system [makers] putting a stake in the ground, that moving forward, this is the best way to go," said Storms.
Operating systems like Android, Chrome OS, iOS, OS X and Windows have long offered either partial (as in the case of iOS and OS X) or complete (Android, Chrome OS, Windows) auto-updates to provide patches; the Chrome and Firefox browsers have gone to fully-silent updates; Microsoft has enforced auto-upgrades to its Internet Explorer (IE) browser; and the most popular plug-ins and add-ons, such as Adobe's Flash and Oracle's Java, have shifted to a more hands-free model.

IBM's Q2 profit and revenue fell, but it expects a rebound this year

A rebound for IBM failed to materialize in the second quarter, as profit and sales declined along with a slump in revenue from hardware and services.
However, in its quarterly financial report Thursday, the company raised its forecast for earnings per share, excluding restructuring charges, for the year.
Second-quarter net income declined 17 percent from the year-earlier period to $3.2 billion, while revenue declined by 3 percent to $24.9 billion. Adjusting for currency fluctuations, revenue was down 1 percent.
Revenue was under the forecast of $25.37 billion from analysts polled by Thomson Reuters. However, operating earnings per share, excluding restructuring charges, was $3.91, above the analyst forecast of $3.77.
IBM raised its full-year earnings forecast to $16.90 a share, up from $16.70 previously. The numbers exclude restructuring and other charges.
The decline in both profit and revenue was worse than last quarter, when IBM reported a 5 percent decline in revenue to $23.4 billion and a 1 percent drop on net income to $3 billion.
But traders, apparently pleased by IBM earnings-per-share numbers, boosted company shares in after-hours trading to $194.55, up by $0.70 from the day's closing number.
IBM is generally considered a bellwether for the tech industry due to its global reach and broad portfolio of software, hardware and services. What's more, in a sign of the company's importance as an indicator for markets in general, it is the most heavily weighted stock on the Dow Jones Industrial Average index.
Though services and overall hardware sales dropped during the second quarter, company officials stressed strength in software and big systems.
"In the second quarter, we delivered strong performance in our higher-value software and mainframe businesses," said Ginni Rometty, IBM chairman, president and chief executive officer. Rometty said she expects improvement in the last half of the year, partly as a result of restructuring efforts that include acquisitions, sales of nonstrategic businesses and "skills rebalancing."
Software sales totaled $6.4 billion, an increase of 4 percent year over year. Middleware, including WebSphere, information management, Tivoli and Social Workforce Solutions (formerly Lotus), generated $4.3 billion in revenue, up 9 percent.
The company's key Global Technology Services segment, however, suffered a 5 percent decline in revenue to $9.5 billion.
Revenue for the Systems and Technology unit, which includes hardware products, was $3.8 billion, down 12 percent.
Revenue for major geographic segments of the company's business were flat or in decline during the quarter. Revenue for the Americas was $10.7 billion, a decrease of 3 percent; revenue from the Europe/Middle East/Africa area was flat at $7.8 billion; and Asia-Pacific revenue decreased 8 percent to $5.8 billion.

Microsoft must embrace 'grim option' of Windows cannibalization

Microsoft must be ready to accept, as has Apple, that it's better to cannibalize one's own sales than to let others do it, a research analyst said today.
"This is going to be a tough shift for Microsoft, to ask them to now accept that the world is a very different place than it used to be," said Al Gillen of research firm IDC.
That shift is the corporate reorganization unveiled last week to support aradical strategy of retreating from decades of selling packaged software and advancing on sustainable services and potentially-lucrative devices.

Corporate reorganization

As part of the reorganization, Microsoft will consolidate all of its client OSes, including Windows 8, Windows RT, Windows Phone 8, Windows Embedded and Xbox, into a single engineering group led by Tony Myerson, head of Windows Phone, which was part of a soon-to-be-defunct Entertainment and Devices division.
"The Windows desktop client and mobile have a lot of common functionality, and a combined group could have a lot of synergy," Gillen said of the under-one-roof reshuffle. Like most outside analysts, Gillen and his IDC colleagues believe that the marriage of Windows under Myerson will eventually lead to a common code base, which will in turn let developers write an app that runs on the "Modern" side of Windows as well as on Windows Phone.
"The larger question that remains is whether a consolidation of the operating systems engineering work and the consolidation of the client division will make it not only possible, but also more probable, that Microsoft will make the right decisions," Gillen and other IDC analysts wrote in a recently-published research note.
And those decisions may include a big and bitter pill for a company that, for better or worse, is identified by "Windows" as much as by its "Microsoft" nameplate.
To pull off the switcheroo from software to "devices and services," Microsoft may have to abandon the high margins of the former for the lower margins of devices.
"[It] may mean taking actions that cannibalize some dimensions of its business through the sale of lower-cost, lower-profit products," Gillen wrote in the note. "Historically, Microsoft has resisted internal cannibalization, and while such a move may still seem like a grim option, it remains infinitely more attractive than allowing competitors to do the cannibalization on Microsoft's behalf."

Move to devices

CEO Steve Ballmer himself hinted last week at that approach when he hammered home the phrase "family of devices" in a public memo outlining the reasons for the corporate realignment. In that memo, Ballmer relegated Windows to a "shell" -- his word -- subservient to the device, a 180-degree turn from Windows-as-preeminent, the common denominator of virtually all PCs.
If that's the case, and if Microsoft is to capture a meaningful share of the phone and tablet markets as its historic base, the personal computer, shinks, the company must produce -- either on its own or in partnership with OEMs -- mobile devices that consumers and businesses want.
It's failed to do that thus far.
IDC, then, was suggesting that Microsoft must, at least in the main, sell devices based on lower prices. And the only significant component of a Windows-powered device that can be cut further -- hardware margins are at or very near the bone, and have been for years -- is the Windows license.
In other words, the IDC researchers implied that Microsoft must be prepared to accept lower revenue from Windows as an OS, and hope to make up the difference -- and ideally much more than that -- on device volume. Higher volume there means more end-points in the potential services sales pool.
Failure means that tablets and smartphones sold or backed by rivals Apple and Google will continue to gnaw at PC sales: cannibalization. Success could create a classic "virtuous cycle," where progress reinforces progress through a positive feedback loop.
Apple, for instance, accomplished that with the iPhone by selling phones to create a market for app developers, who then responded with the largest mobile app inventory on the planet, which in turn convinced customers to buy even more iPhones.

Apple as a template

Ballmer offered no clues as to exactly how Microsoft will do that, offering only optimism that the company was up for the challenge. "Frankly it's different to deliver something that has production costs, if you will, than it is software, which basically has no production costs, and we're going to get excellent at that [emphasis added]," Ballmer said during a conference call with reporters and Wall Street analysts last week.
He does have a template: Apple.
Although their sales volumes are wildly different -- Apple sold a mere 4 million Macs in the first quarter, a three-month stretch when OEMs shipped 77 millions PCs, nearly 20 times more -- Apple has embraced cannibalization of its personal computers.
"I see cannibalization as a huge opportunity for us," Apple CEO Tim Cook said in January when reporting 2012's fourth quarter results. "Our base philosophy is to never fear cannibalization. If we do, somebody else will just cannibalize it, and so we never fear it. We know that iPad will cannibalize some Macs, [so] that doesn't worry us."
Ballmer has never breathed such blasphemy. But he'd better, Gillen contended, even though it would be painful.
"On devices like tablets and phones, the operating system is a differentiator," said Gillen. "But customers have zero visibility as to the OS [on a device]." While people may recognize "iPhone" or "Galaxy," and refer to the devices by those names, most would be hard-pressed to name "iOS" or "Android" as the operating system.
"That'll be tough," Gillen said of Microsoft walking away from "Windows" as a self-expression of the company to focus on devices and services. "It's built so much brand equity around Windows."
Yet that's the path Microsoft should walk. "Microsoft will be a lot healthier and prepared to create and compete in new markets, rather than just defend its legacy markets, when the brand 'Microsoft' becomes more important [and] prominent at Redmond than the brand 'Windows,'" Gillen said.

W3-810 Windows 8 tablet shows its 8-inch screen again, this time on Acer’s own website


Acer has partially revealed its first 8-inch tablet to run Microsoft Windows 8, and it’s the full version instead of the cut-down Windows RT software, which Acer is known for disliking. The Iconia W3 is billed as a device which puts desktop computing into a highly portable tablet form factor, thanks to its convenient 8-inch screen and optional keyboard dock. The tablet has shown up on the company’s Finnish website, but not its U.S. or UK sites just yet.
If all this is causing little bells to ring inside your head, it’s because this is the same tablet which was leaked by Amazon at the beginning of the month, then tipped for release on June 4 by an Acer executive. Like the leaked tablet, the W3-810 runs Windows 8 Pro and has an 8-inch screen with a 1280 x 768 pixel resolution, while it’s powered by an Intel Atom Z2760 processor, complete with 2GB of RAM. Intel’s Atom chip has also been seen in other Windows 8 tablets, including Acer’s own Iconia W510, along with others such as the Asus VivoTab and HP’s Elitepad 900.
The W3’s spec list continues with 32GB of memory, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, a microHDMI port, and a battery which should last eight hours. A keyboard dock is also pictured, which as you can see above is wider than the tablet itself, plus a second W3-810 tablet, this time with 64GB of memory will also be sold. As for the cost, the W3 tablet leaked by Amazon was priced at $380, but this would be without the keyboard dock.
There’s no option to buy the W3-810 through Acer’s website yet, nor are there any retailers which show up as stocking the tablet. However, as someone in Finland appears to have pushed the button on the W3-810 earlier than they should have, there’s a good chance the June 4 announcement date will hold true.

LENOVO THINKPAD T431S REVIEW


Though Lenovo’s ThinkPad laptops are a mainstay of the corporate world, they’re not without their woes. Forced to deal with significant challenges thanks to the Ultrabook – and computing’s inevitable march towards thinner, lighter designs – Lenovo’s engineers have had to make some major changes. Thinness implies portability, but it can also lead to fragility and can compromise functionality. How can a laptop slim down without suffering from these faults?
This Ultrabook simply doesn’t look or feel as durable as its predecessors. And that’s a shame.
Several answers have already come from Lenovo, but they’ve either been expensive (the ThinkPad X1 and ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch) or not that thin and light (the Lenovo ThinkPad T430u). Now, Lenovo’s bringing out the T431s, an Ultrabook that tries to find a better compromise between price and portability.
The T431s is also something of a showcase for ThinkPad’s new design direction. As with other recent models, the old beveled keyboard has been replaced with a newer island-style design. Change has also made its way to the touchpad, which offers integrated, not tactile, buttons. The display bezel is now thinner, the port selection revised and reduced, and the battery is not easily replaced.
All of these changes are likely to send brand loyalists into shock. But is there real reason to worry, or is this the redesign ThinkPad needs to keep up with the modern competition?

From black suit to little black dress

ThinkPads aren’t known for style. That’s not to say they’ve been poorly dressed, but their preference for functional professionalism can be off-putting to some buyers. Lenovo is trying to rectify this with some new models, and the T431s continues Lenovo’s newfound respect for fashion. Though not eye-catching, the system’s thin display bezel, slim side profile, and semi-gloss lid present a more approachable exterior than the matte black bricks of old.


Fans of earlier designs will worry that fashion is being put before function, and they’re probably right. This new Ultrabook doesn’t provide the same confidence as its thicker brethren. For example, the hinges are much thinner than those found in a standard T-series, and the new chassis appears to thwart, rather than invite, in-field repairs.
But don’t take this to mean the T431s doesn’t feel like a quality product. The chassis is rigid, the hinges tight, and the panel gaps thin. Like other ThinkPads, this system looks and feels more like a tool than a style statement, even if it is more attractive than its ancestors.

The usual ports

There are just two USB ports available (both 3.0) along with Mini DisplayPort and VGA for video-out, a lone audio jack, an SD card reader, and a smart card reader. Ethernet is available as well.
This selection of ports is mundane for an Ultrabook and feels a bit lackluster considering the focus on functionality. An additional USB port would have been nice at the very least.

Change can be good … and bad

The T431s features the new(ish) AccuType keyboard, which ditches an old-school beveled design for the more popular island-style layout. Though the new keyboard is different, it’s still among the best in the market thanks to a spacious layout and good key travel. Our only complaint is the function key. As with previous models, Lenovo swapped its location with the Ctrl key – a trait unique to ThinkPads that may confusion new users.
Backlighting is activated by a function hotkey, and there are two brightness settings available. We noticed significant light leak from under the F1 to F12 row (that is, light which leaks around the keys rather than through it), which could be distracting in a dark room.

A change that’s new to the T431s is a flat touchpad that ditches tactile buttons for an integrated design common in consumer PCs. The reason for the move is obvious: older ThinkPads had big buttons surrounding a tiny touchpad, which made the touchpad itself hard to use. Going the opposite direction, however, hasn’t worked out.
Using the trackpointer, a unique joystick-like mouse input found on most ThinkPads, is now more difficult because there’s less tactile feel to help users distinguish between the left, right, and middle mouse buttons. Yet, this sacrifice is in vain because the larger touchpad surface is still less than ideal. It doesn’t offer a pleasing texture and feels hollow. At least multi-touch gestures work well.

Productivity over entertainment

Our review unit arrived with a matte 1600 x 900 display. Though less impressive than a glossy 1080p display, the resolution is a good match for the 14-inch display and the matte finish wards off glare. This makes the display perfectly usable even in direct sunlight despite its low maximum brightness.
The usability of matte tends to hurt quality, however, and the T431s is no exception. Our tests revealed that the display can render just 60 percent of the sRGB spectrum and suffers from poor contrast and black levels. Subjectively, these numbers makes photos, games, and movies appear dull, but all matte displays exhibit poor contrast and black levels relative to their glossy brethren. A matte finish may sound dire, but this is the inevitable trade-off necessary to banish glare. 



Audio quality is a somewhat better story thanks to a clear mid-range volume and a decent maximum volume. But this is no boom box. The speakers will do if you’re stuck in a hotel room without headphones, but a pair of headphones or external speakers will offer a major upgrade.

Fast processor, slow hard drive

Our review unit arrived with a Core i5-3437U processor, 4GB of RAM, and a 500GB hard drive. This configuration is exactly mid-range in the current T431s lineup and average among Ultrabooks in general.
The processor, which is clocked at 1.9 GHz, returned a SiSoft Sandra Processor Arithmetic score of 42.7 GOPS and a 7-Zip score of 7,984 MIPS. These figures are above average for the category.
PCMark 7, a test that strains multiple components, turned in a less complimentary result of 2,956. This is certainly towards the low end of scores we typically receive from Ultrabooks. Most blame comes from the mechanical hard drive, which offers good capacity but suffers from lackluster access times.
3D performance from the integrated Intel HD 4000 graphics solution also came in below par with a Cloud Gate score of 28,533 and a Fire Strike score of 415. Most Ultrabooks score over 30,000 in Cloud Gate and around 500 in Fire Strike. However, the relevance of this is less than the numbers suggest because there’s really no Intel HD 4000 that is good for gaming. You’d have a hard time telling the difference between this system and other HD 4000-powered Ultrabooks with the naked eye.

Storable and portable

While the merit of the sacrifices made by the T431s can be debated, they most certainly have reduced the weight. Fully loaded, this Ultrabook comes in at just 3.6 pounds, which is excellent for a device with a 14-inch display. Lenovo reduced the thickness to just 0.8 inches, as well, making this among the thinnest ThinkPads ever.
Something thin yet reasonably affordable was needed, and the T431s delivers.
Normally, a dramatic reduction in size and weight means reduced endurance, but that doesn’t seem to be the case here. The battery held up for about two hours during our high-load Battery Eater stress test – a figure that extended to almost five hours of constant Web browsing and seven hours in our near-idle Reader’s Test. These numbers aren’t exceptional, but they do put the T431s a smidge above the Ultrabook average.
Power consumption was low overall in our testing. The Ultrabook consumed just 10 watts at idle with maximum display brightness and no more than 33 watts at full load. Only a few competitors, like the Dell XPS 13, sip less power.

A solution for you

This being a ThinkPad, the T431s ships with a variety of Lenovo utilities that can help keep drivers up to date, power consumption low, and Wi-Fi connections solid. Execution of these apps varies. The Solution Center itself isn’t bad, but the design of some other apps – particularly those forged in the Metro style – is questionable. Over-sized icons and wonky menus are common. Still, some tools are helpful, which is more than can be said of most pre-installed software.
Besides Lenovo’s own software, there are also a variety of third-party apps; most of which can be ignored or deleted immediately and will never worry the user again. In what seems to be a new trend, Lenovo has installed a portal into a Norton antivirus app, but not the antivirus trial itself, so you won’t be annoyed by pop-ups.

Hotter than it looks on paper

In spite of its slim profile, the ThinkPad T431s has plenty of room to breathe. In our tests, its external temperature never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit even at full load. At idle, temperatures were more regularly in the low 80s. These are good results for an Ultrabook.
Lenovo 431S left side port and vents macro
The fan wasn’t overworked either. We registered a reading of 40.2 decibels at idle, which increased to a maximum of 43.6 decibels at full load. Once again, these figures are better than average for this category.
However, while the numbers look good, the T431s sometimes felt hot during real-world use. This is because the touchpad surface is among the system’s warmest surfaces. Other Ultrabooks report higher temperatures but feel cooler because their hot-spots are away from the user’s hands.

Conclusion

Lenovo’s new design makes a lot of changes, and change doesn’t usually come without compromise – and even, at times, sacrifice. Lenovo put to rest some of the traits that longtime fans consider crucial to the brand, such as tactile touchpad buttons and a beveled keyboard. This Ultrabook simply doesn’t look or feel as durable as its predecessors. And that’s a shame.
But the world doesn’t stand still. Lenovo’s traditional ThinkPad laptops are too bulky for some buyers to consider in light of new, ultra-thin designs. Something thin yet reasonably affordable was needed, and the T431s delivers. This model is extremely light and thin for its display size, yet still offers good endurance and strong processor performance. A few points, like hard drive performance and the touchpad, could use improvement, but the overall package achieves the goal of putting ThinkPad productivity into a thinner, lighter package.
So far so good, which leaves the T431s with one major hurdle to jump: price. This new model starts at $1,049, but you’ll have to pay $1,149 for the configuration we reviewed, which is a lot for an Ultrabook with a mechanical hard drive. A solid-state drive is only available on the top-end $1,449 model, at which point the T431s must go up against the very best of the Asus ZenBook line, the Dell XPS 13 with 1080p display, and even the MacBook Pro 13-inch with Retina. And this business-centric ThinkPad can’t hang with that crowd.
Lenovo tends to slash products below MSRP regularly, so this system may soon sell for $1,000 or less, at which point it would earn our recommendation. That’s not the current situation, however, so we can’t account for that in our score. As it stands today, the T431s is an excellent 14-incher for people interested in mobile productivity, but the price is a bit too high for the hardware.

Highs:

  • Professional yet attractive design
  • Light and portable
  • Class-leading keyboard
  • Matte anti-glare display
  • Above-average battery endurance
  • Good processor performance

Lows:


  • Poor display quality
  • Finicky touchpad
  • Slow hard drive
  • A bit over-priced